To all you guys who have sent me mail calling me a sexist, money grabbing, corrupt, 2 bit, lesbian, moron, bitch who does not know what she is talking about - you too have a right to be wrong. However, if you wish me to post your comments please reveal yourselves - anonymous blogging is for cowards.
To Matthew O Connor - "feeding me to your membership" and sending me 9500 e mails telling me that your organisation is watching me is not flattering, an ex boyfriend told me that even he would have stopped at 1000. Neither is it intimidating, although if you advise your membership to use the same tactic on their ex partners, it is no wonder they have problems with contact with their children!!!!!
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
To all you nice men at Fathers for Justice
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
Oh dear, and I expect these same people are angry at today's news that Al-Qaeda are threatening to retaliate against Britain for giving a knighthood to Salman Rushdie. Glad you're not intimidated.
When will these f4j members realise that to get their message across they need to assert clearly what their needs are and how to get them met without resorting to bullying tactics.
Screaming is for losers.
Danny Casca says....
To send over 100 e.mails for the purpose of intimadation is cowardly. But 9,500 is an absloute disgrace. The perpetrators should be sent to the Tower of London.
Fathers for Justice was set up to be a respected organisation, not a bunch of vagabonds.
There's a law firm in the South of England - who advertised their family department on a massive bill board.
F4J had written "Scum" right across it.
I spoke to the senior partner - and he was chuffed. By his reckoning they had advertised his firm as being successful in helping wives.
Oh - how I laughed.
I'm with John Bolch.
Stay strong! Good is worth fighting for. Weak men do not know this but instead sell themselves to their own wickedness. Misery loves company.
Fucking losers!
Goodness. I thought your post was good/well-balanced. I am at a loss to understand the reaction! People who resort to attempts to harass and intimidate people have lost the argument.
I have for a while regarded with suspicion the claims made by this organisation that the courts "discriminate" against them and just randomly deny them contact with their children. If this is how they behave, then it is small wonder. Furthermore, given that non-payment of child maintenance by non-resident parents is a vast social problem, as is the child poverty that results, a campaign which effectively encourages non-resident parents to refuse to pay is irresponsible in the extreme.
What a bunch of thugs.
HI your blog aimed at F4J members states "if you wish me to post your comments please reveal yourselves - anonymous blogging is for cowards"
I am now reading anti F4J comments about this blog left from "anonymous" so are these people cowards too? And why do you post anonymous blogs that are anti F4J and not pro F4J, could it be that you wish to tell only one side of the story? You are obviously not treating people equally!
I think the only coward is You, lets see if you dare approve this comment?
Kind regards, Oliver Allan Stones of Bridlington East Yorkshire,
email address bigoliver@hotmail.com
Not a coward but an F4J activist
Oliver - Quite simply if someone wants to insult or abuse me personally on my blog than I require to know who they are. Anonymous commenting on the legal arguments is OK by me.
Lee Doyle,
Whilst your children are minors you are financially responsible for them and should continue to support them. Such rules produce a veneer of civilisation which separates us from animals and enables our society to function.
If your ex partner is refusing to allow you to see your children for no good reason, and you are a good dad as you claim then you should use the system to transfer residence to you. E mail me if you want some free advice.
Transfer residence!! and what hope does he have in getting this awarded to him? You really are missing the point lynn. Tell him on here from your own experiences in family law, of what chance he has, as the childrens father, in obtaining full residence of his children over mother!!
Lee Doyle,
I have offered to help you for free. If you want me to then e mail me. Meantime, keep paying your CSA assessment. Not contributing financially for your children's upbringing is a serious breakdown of parental responsibility.
Lynne,
you make the valid point that "Not contributing financially for your children's upbringing is a serious breakdown of parental responsibility." However, this does NOT necessarily mean that paying whatever the CSA demands is the way to fulfil this responsibility, which is what you seem to imply.
In this context, I see that another blog has just included the point I made elsewhere on your own blog about shared care, and this can be found at:
http://clarendonflt.blogspot.com/search/label/Child%20Maintenance?max-results=20
The Government is clearly aware of the injustice, but has neglected to correct it in the "Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill" which was published on 6th June 2007.
how ironic, lee doyle is now in jail for abusing a 4 year old! that is not a GOOD dad!
Post a Comment